Once corsets were introduced, they proved to have great staying power. Shapes and styles changed over the years, but the corset remained the women's underwear choice until the late nineteenth century. Of course, there were generally more practical alternatives for women who worked, either inside or outside the home. Even these garments, however, generally resembled corsets but were less compressive. Clothing Reform Movement In the late 1800s, two movements began that would ultimately lead to the development of the modern bra. Early feminists recognized that freedom from restrictive women's underwear was necessary before women could take on a larger role in society. Meanwhile, doctors began to recognize the health risks of tightlaced corsetry. In the late 19th century, numerous patents were filed for breast-supporting corset alternatives. However, many of these designs were never manufactured. Only a handful of educated feminists and female athletes purchased the early bras. World War I World War I brought ...
Once corsets were introduced, they proved to have great staying power. Shapes and styles changed over the years, but the corset remained the women's underwear choice until the late nineteenth century. Of course, there were generally more practical alternatives for women who worked, either inside or outside the home. Even these garments, however, generally resembled corsets but were less compressive. Clothing Reform Movement In the late 1800s, two movements began that would ultimately lead to the development of the modern bra. Early feminists recognized that freedom from restrictive women's underwear was necessary before women could take on a larger role in society. Meanwhile, doctors began to recognize the health risks of tightlaced corsetry. In the late 19th century, numerous patents were filed for breast-supporting corset alternatives. However, many of these designs were never manufactured. Only a handful of educated feminists and female athletes purchased the early bras. World War I World War I brought a lot of support for the emerging bra movement. Steel was commonly used for the stays in corsets, but was needed for the war effort. Meanwhile, women went to work in factories and industrial plants in great numbers. Societal attitudes began to change. The 1920s to the 1960s After the war, the bra became much more accepted. By the late 1920s, it had replaced the corset as the major staple of women's underwear. Shapes and styles changed with fluctuating fashions, but the garment remained largely the same. Counter Culture The women's liberation movement of the 1960s led record numbers of women to stop wearing bras altogether. Although bra-burning was likely much less common than urban legends would indicate, many women simply stopped wearing them. Bra manufacturers fought back by capitalizing on the sexual liberation of the time to introduce increasingly daring alternative styles. It was during this time that women's underwear options dramatically grew. The 1970s to Today Today, women's underwear is big business. Sexy lingerie and matching lingerie sets are quite common. Whether you are in the mood for a demure and elegant bra and brief set or something a bit wilder, your options are virtually unlimited.
http://ask.studybible.info/index.php?qa=user&qa_1=eashion
Posted by Lingerie Store in Australia (guest) on Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:28:31 +0000
A further issue is that video gaming became one of the all-time largest forms of fun for people of nearly every age. Kids enjoy video games, and adults do, too. The XBox 360 is among the favorite video games systems for those who love to have hundreds of games available to them, as well as who like to experiment with live with others all over the world. Thanks for sharing your thinking.
http://badsquad.net/26-februari-cheat-rules-of-survival-pc-2-0-cit-pekalongan/
Posted by citpekalongan (guest) on Mon, 27 May 2019 15:46:50 +0000
Hey! This post couldn't be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of my good old room mate! He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this write-up to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!
http://www.appnetidx.com/2019/epson-l3110-l3150-adjustment-program-free-download-with/
Posted by epson l3110 resetter free cracked download (guest) on Mon, 27 May 2019 09:48:41 +0000
Search engine optimization is the best way to rank well in search engines. If you want to see your website on top position in organic search then you must optimize your website. There are two ways of SEO – White hat & Black hat. White hat optimization work according to search engine guidelines and black hat give spam results. SEO is a very hot theme in cyberspace. After-all, every person wants to better search engine positions and arrive up on the initial page of Google search and get more site visitors. Sometimes it is simple to get carried away with SEO though. In my personal opinion, the best approach is to keep that simple and apply somewhat of common sense.
https://socialseoteam.com/get-backlinks-boost-link-portfolio-authority-backlinks/
Posted by backlinks (guest) on Thu, 23 May 2019 03:54:33 +0000
I've observed that in the world these days, video games are the latest craze with children of all ages. Many times it may be extremely hard to drag your son or daughter away from the activities. If you want the best of both worlds, there are several educational video games for kids. Interesting post.
http://tested.ocgnet.us/h1z1-just-survive-keygen-working-100-multiplayer-free/
Posted by toggle ads h1z1 (guest) on Wed, 22 May 2019 03:37:26 +0000
I know this if off topic but I'm looking into starting my own blog and was wondering what all is required to get set up? I'm assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I'm not very internet smart so I'm not 100 positive. Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks
http://toplist.frc9.us/broken-blade-riven-patch-9-4-na-ranked-epic/
Posted by league of legends broken blade (guest) on Tue, 21 May 2019 00:13:32 +0000
One other issue issue is that video games usually are serious naturally with the principal focus on understanding rather than enjoyment. Although, there is an entertainment feature to keep children engaged, every single game is often designed to work on a specific experience or course, such as mathmatical or technology. Thanks for your write-up.
http://tested.ocgnet.us/E29C85free-pubg-cheat-2019-free-download-E29C85/
Posted by unknowncheats pubg (guest) on Thu, 16 May 2019 03:49:02 +0000
<p>In one Upanishadic Story there was one Sage -Yajnavalkya– who gave a long speach to the king Janaka and proved that he is Immortal, becuase his Soul {Atma] is immortal, and took away 1000 cows and gold coins as reward. And there is one Deepak Chopra [Modern Yajnavalkya] who mixes some few catch words from Quantum Physics with spiritual jargon and declares that “You are Iternity” in his books, and laughs all the way to his Banks. IN the west Templeton Foundation grants huge money to scientists who use subtle language in favour of religion and God. I suspect that Prof. M.S Hegde has taken an Agency to sell Baba Ramdev’s products or he has recieved some grant from Religious “Muts” which are very rich in his destrict,to manipulate the minds of people,the Whole destrict being deeply religious.</p>
http://www.wearefreemen.com/2017/10/21/message-seeing-stars/
Posted by Suzette (guest) on Sun, 05 May 2019 21:18:20 +0000
<blockquote><p> Is there a requirement for producing 8/9 L research papers every year? What is the purpose of such output if it cannot be used?</p></blockquote><p>Why do you think research papers are written in ANY field? To figure out new stuff. Do you have science training in any field? Do you follow research literature in any area? Medicine is not unique from any science.</p><blockquote><p> Are you justifying failures made by doctors by this argument?</p></blockquote><p>No, I am saying that you have unrealistic expectations from doctors, humanly unrealistic. Doctors are expected to know the guidelines, not the specific risk levels of every treatment option <em>by heart</em>.</p><p>This is not unique to medicine. You cannot expect any science professional to blurt out research data whenever you demand it. This isn’t the 15th century where there would be a handful of texts that people would memorize. Modern medicine and any science in general is far more comprehensive.</p><blockquote><p> There is...
<blockquote><p> Is there a requirement for producing 8/9 L research papers every year? What is the purpose of such output if it cannot be used?</p></blockquote><p>Why do you think research papers are written in ANY field? To figure out new stuff. Do you have science training in any field? Do you follow research literature in any area? Medicine is not unique from any science.</p><blockquote><p> Are you justifying failures made by doctors by this argument?</p></blockquote><p>No, I am saying that you have unrealistic expectations from doctors, humanly unrealistic. Doctors are expected to know the guidelines, not the specific risk levels of every treatment option <em>by heart</em>.</p><p>This is not unique to medicine. You cannot expect any science professional to blurt out research data whenever you demand it. This isn’t the 15th century where there would be a handful of texts that people would memorize. Modern medicine and any science in general is far more comprehensive.</p><blockquote><p> There is sufficient information to confirm that doctors only use intution and this is mostly flawed.</p></blockquote><p>That’s nonsense. Doctors use guidelines set forth by their professional bodies. To analyze research literature on a given topic, takes teams of researchers and several months. Intuition fills the gaps. There is of course more intuition at play in medical settings in poor countries since the tests are less affordable and reliable.</p><blockquote><p> Based upon what you have defined till now, there is no difference in doctors and quacks: both work by intution.</p></blockquote><p>You are just hearing what you want to hear.</p><blockquote><p> “Doctors just implement guidelines produced for them. ”<br /> By whom?</p></blockquote><p>Researchers who do meta-analyses.</p><p>[url="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta-analysis" rel="nofollow"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta-analysis[/url]</p><p>Professional bodies. Universities.</p><blockquote><p> When does the new research get implemented?</p></blockquote><p>After it goes through the review process, when the research community systematically weights it against existing evidence. The time these things take varies based on disease, strength of evidence etc.</p><blockquote><p> Who picks up the right paper from the 8/9 L studies and who decides to implement it?</p></blockquote><p>A multitude of academic researchers, in every sub-specialty, from every developed country. Half my previous academic department was busy in these analyses projects. This is a global academic effort, not some pharma conspiracy as you seem to think</p><blockquote><p> There is a paper by WHO confirming that use Paracetamol is bad for the child during febrile condition. What is the present status? Paracetamol was introduced in early 50s and has been linked to many deaths in children.</p></blockquote><p>I am not going to go and look up for you. Learn to cite papers.</p><blockquote><p> This is ae extremely incorrect and irresponsible statement. Who is responsible for drugs recall and why?</p></blockquote><p>You can learn the basics here</p><p>[url="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmacovigilance" rel="nofollow"]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmacovigilance[/url]</p><p>This is serious business.</p><blockquote><p> Vioxx, Actos are common everyday issues in medical world. Every year many deaths occur due to prescription drugs. Prescription drugs are among the major reason for deaths in USA.</p></blockquote><p>Medications do cause deaths. Everyone in medicine knows about the IOM report that estimated 48K deaths. However, drugs save far, far more lives than that.</p><blockquote><p> Medical science is one architecture that completely defies logic.</p></blockquote><p>It does not. Medicine is no different from any other science. It is entirely logical and mathematical. Do you have any training in logic or statistics? Perhaps the reason it defies YOUR logic is that you don’t understand research in general?</p><blockquote><p> Every disease is managed.</p></blockquote><p>No, diseases are cured, prevented and managed.</p><p>You are now living in a world where modern medicine already conquered infectious diseases that have through out the history of mankind have been the single largest killer. 40 years was the best average life expectancy until the modern era. 100 years ago, Indian life expectancy at birth was 19 years. Neonatal deaths were common, as were maternal deaths around delivery. You don’t see much of any of them any more. Vaccines have eradicated or contained many killers. Now, the next challenges for medical science are chronic diseases and cancers. You can already add decades of life in cases of both.</p><p>What diseases have your quackery systems solved? NAME A SINGLE ONE.</p><p>Where is the scientific evidence that they perform well against mainstream alternatives? If they do, they will become mainstream methods. Modern medicine isn’t an ideology. It is just about whatever-works.</p><blockquote><p> As my doctor friend says: I have seldom seen anyone get well.</p></blockquote><p>Well, I have a medical degree. I have seen plenty get well. I have no idea what the hell your friend is talking about.</p><blockquote><p> Would a medical researcher be able to confirm the best option between radiology, chemo or surgery for a patient with breast cancer?</p></blockquote><p>Researchers usually work at population levels, not at patient levels.</p><p>Oncologists are quite quantitative. They consult evidence in selecting the best possible treatment from the options available. Since the cancer drugs are toxic (it is very hard to distinguish between normal cells and cancer cells… much harder problem than distinguishing between infectious agents and human cells), quite a bit of care is taken. But these are just really hard problems. Some cancers are easy to cure, others – not so much.</p><blockquote><p> If the specialist knows so much</p></blockquote><p>No one knows too much. A specialist simply knows more than non-specialists.</p><blockquote><p> why has no start been made to ensure breast cancer should not appear in the first place?</p></blockquote><p>I work around cancer researchers. I am constantly amazed at the science brought to bear on the problem of cancers. We will eventually get there.</p><p>This is not however an easy problem. It is a far more complicated problem than infectious diseases. Back when infectious diseases were wiping out entire villages and country sides, no one needed to care about cancer very much. We are lucky to even live in a world where cancer and chronic diseases are our main headaches. Please read the medical history of the world from any proper scholarly source.</p><p>It is pure illiteracy to compare the accomplishments of modern medicine with say homeopathy (water and sugar pills), an illiteracy that is however surprisingly pervasive.</p><blockquote><p> I am sure he has reasons and is capable to say what he says.</p></blockquote><p>The entire problem is that he has not shown that capacity. There are several articles on this site on his pseudoscience predilections and they go beyond medicine.</p><blockquote><p> Medical science is NOT about curing patients, it is about the money to be made at the cost of patients who visit doctors in the hope of spending a better tomarrow.</p></blockquote><p>You are just buying into pseudoscience propaganda. Medicine is about preventing, curing and managing – i.e. do whatever we can possibly do against disease and support health using the best available knowledge in science and technology.</p><p>Medical science is about knowledge and health, not money. Medical business (and quackery is just as much a business) is a different matter. So campaign for socialized medicine and against medicine as a business. That is a political problem, not a science problem.</p><blockquote><p> There is seldom any valid evidence to justify medical processes.</p></blockquote><p>Look, you just know nothing about medicine. These are nonsensical statements. All clinical research does is produce evidence.</p><blockquote><p> With lakhs of papers being printed by researchers, there is one in a billion chance that a correct procedure is applied to a patient considering patient variability.</p></blockquote><p>Picking research papers is not a lottery draw. It is a very systematic process. Teams of clinicians, statisticians and other support staff spend a lot of effort distilling evidence. Just because it looks like a blackbox to you does not mean it is one to people with an actual education in the area.</p><p>Why do you think modern medicine does clinical trials. Because it understands patient variability. If it considered every patient to be same, testing in one patient would be enough. This is another propaganda piece from quacks – oh, we are holistic, we are personalized, we go to the root cause… none of these claims are true.</p><blockquote><p> If end results have any meaning, medical science as practised today, is the biggest quackery.</p></blockquote><p>You just are a person who has no understanding of medical science.</p><p>Here is my peeve with people like you. When you know nothing about astronomy, you won’t go argue that astronomers don’t get it. But with medicine, every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows better, despite the fact that modern medicine changed humanity far more than say, astronomy.</p><p>Take some free courses on medical research that are freely available online from top universities.</p><p>Start here</p><p>[url="https://www.coursera.org/learn/clinical-trials" rel="nofollow"]https://www.coursera.org/learn/clinical-trials[/url]</p><p>First finish that and then debate.</p>
http://www.wearefreemen.com/2018/03/31/el-the-bloodlines-complete-first-half/
Posted by Isabelle (guest) on Sun, 05 May 2019 21:17:02 +0000
Great blog post. A few things i would like to make contributions about is that computer system memory ought to be purchased if your computer is unable to cope with that which you do with it. One can install two random access memory boards having 1GB each, as an example, but not certainly one of 1GB and one with 2GB. One should look for the company's documentation for own PC to be certain what type of storage is needed.
http://extraproxies.com
Posted by Nola Wheelan (guest) on Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:14:32 +0000